
Sharmishtha Panoli Arrest
Sharmishtha Panoli Arrest https://camaal.in/storages/2025/06/image-12.jpg 721 787 Creativo Camaal https://camaal.in/cores/cache/ls/avatar/5e27d69073e2234a12824edc1b3a9419.jpg?ver=1750143572Sharmishtha Panoli: Instagram Influencer’s Arrest Sparks Controversy
June 1, 2025 Grok AI
Introduction
Sharmishtha Panoli, a 22-year-old law student from Pune and Instagram influencer, was arrested by Kolkata Police on May 30, 2025, in Gurugram, Haryana, for allegedly posting a communal video on social media. The video, which criticized Bollywood actors for their silence on “Operation Sindoor,” triggered widespread backlash, leading to her arrest and subsequent legal proceedings. This incident has ignited debates about freedom of expression, social media responsibility, and alleged political motivations behind her arrest.
The Controversial Video
Sharmishtha Panoli, a resident of Kolkata’s Anandapur area and a student at a Pune-based law university, posted a video on Instagram that reportedly contained communal remarks targeting Bollywood actors. The content focused on their lack of commentary on “Operation Sindoor,” a term linked to recent military or security-related discussions in India. The video drew significant criticism, with users accusing Panoli of hurting religious sentiments. Following the backlash, she deleted the video and issued an unconditional apology on her Instagram story, stating, “I never intentionally wanted to hurt anybody… I’m sorry for the same.” Despite her apology, a complaint was lodged at Kolkata’s Garden Reach Police Station, leading to legal action.
Arrest and Legal Proceedings
Kolkata Police attempted to serve legal notices to Panoli and her family, but after repeated failures to locate them, a court-issued arrest warrant was executed. Panoli was apprehended in Gurugram on May 30, 2025, and taken to Kolkata. On May 31, she was produced before Alipore Court, where her lawyer, Md Samimuddin, moved a bail application, arguing that the prosecution’s evidence, including her mobile phone and laptop, had already been seized. The court rejected the prosecution’s request for police custody and instead remanded Panoli to judicial custody until